[rescue] Graphics on a E450
Stephen Conley
cheetah at tanabi.org
Sun Nov 2 17:05:55 UTC 2025
You could do this to have a true monster of a workstation. It was my
'desktop' machine back in the early 2000's for quite a large number of
years. Long enough that I had to replace fans in it and went through
several hard drives for which I was thankful to have a drive cage and
tons of redundancy :D
Is it a good idea? I'd say objectively no. But I was a young guy with
money to burn, a fascination for multi-processor machines, and little to
no common sense so there you have it. That said, I wouldn't judge anyone
who wanted to do it ... like I said in my other post, it's the machine I
have the fondest memory of. Nothing I had that came after it had that
same like 'omg my desktop is a supercomputer' vibe :)
Even if objectively the laptop I'm typing this email on is way more of a
supercomputer than that E450 ... Ah, hardware just isn't as much fun
anymore :)
Steve
On 11/2/25 11:58, Dave McGuire via rescue wrote:
> On 11/2/25 11:42, Alan Perry via rescue wrote:
>> I received a decommissioned E450 from work. I don't see a frame
>> buffer in it, so I guess it ran headless. The E450 falls into a gap
>> in my experience with Sun (I left the first time in '97 and came back
>> in '03). What graphics is supported and how does it compare to SS20
>> graphics? The System Handbook lists PGX, PGX32, PGX64, and Expert3D
>> but I hadn't heard of any of those before I looked at that list.
>
> It can definitely be done, but I'd have to wonder why one would want
> that on a machine that is very clearly a server. I've worked with a
> lot of E450s at a lot of sites, but I don't think I've ever seen one
> with a framebuffer, so clearly I'm not the only person with that opinion.
>
> -Dave
>
More information about the rescue
mailing list