[rescue] Various machines for sale

Lionel Peterson lionel4287 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 8 22:29:04 EST 2025


SCSI scanners were all the rage in early Mac era as I recall - they used big "centronics" style printer cables.

Weren't early sun laser printers SCSI?

NVMe has a much, much greater speed than anything you can hang off a SAS/SCSI connector - PCIe Gen 5, 4 channel devices are on sale at Microcenter today...

Ken

> On Jan 8, 2025, at 21:11, Joshua Boyd via rescue <rescue at sunhelp.org> wrote:
> 
> On 1/8/25 20:56, Dave McGuire via rescue wrote:
>> On January 8, 2025 8:49:52 PM John Francini <francini at mac.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 8, 2025, at 16:34, Dave McGuire via rescue <rescue at sunhelp.org> wrote:
>>>>> ?On 1/8/25 14:56, Mouse via rescue wrote:
>>>>>> As a technical geek, I prefer SCSI too.  I'm sad at how close to dead
>>>>>> it appears to be.
>>>>> Nah, SCSI is doing fine.  There have been many transports for SCSI, beyond parallel:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - SAS
>>>>> - USB
>>>>> - FireWire
>>>>> - FibreChannel
>>>>> - SSA (IBM)
>>>>> 
>>>>> It needn't be a parallel interface on a 50-pin IDC connector to be "SCSI".
>>>>> 
>>>>> And make no mistake, it needed to make the transition to serial, regardless of the specific transport mechanism.  There were skew problems in parallel SCSI in U320; scaling it past that and avoiding skew while still making cables simple and affordable just wasn't practical.
>>> No love for iSCSI? I worked for 10 years for a company (and later a DELL division): EqualLogic, which made iSCSI arrays that would cluster themselves and serve up data through multiple gig/10gig connections. Wonderful product.  Unfortunately iSCSI seems to have been a bit of a fad...
>>   I knew I was forgetting one!  I always found iSCSI a bit odd, and perhaps overdesigned, but yes, it's absolutely SCSI too.
> 
> I feel like I hear more about iSCSI for VMs and netbooting these days than I do FC.  People are saying that iSCSI will be replaced with NVMeoF, but I don't know how long that will take.
> 
> For storage servers, I think there is a lot to be said for SAS SSDs over NVMe SSDs, and as such would think it reasonable to stick with iSCSI over NVMeoF.
> 
> Can't say that I've heard much about iSCSI (or SAS) scanners or printers though. ;)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue_sunhelp.org



More information about the rescue mailing list