[rescue] Solaris 11 SMF oddity

Carl R. Friend crfriend at rcn.com
Mon Sep 11 07:54:11 CDT 2017

On 09/11/2017 08:47 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:

> Unfortunately there was nothing enlightening there, and the services
> would start perfectly well manually.  The problem eventually appeared to
> be that smf had somehow forgotten the service definitions and was trying
> to start them incorrectly.

    Something here smells like an environment problem.  When things
start up from SMF can all the needed libraries be found and read from?
This is a very common problem with self-compiled services that then
try to get integrated into SMF.


| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin)            | Boylston            |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast            | Massachusetts, USA  |
| mailto:crfriend at rcn.com                        +---------------------+
| http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum           | ICBM: 42:20N 71:43W |

More information about the rescue mailing list