[rescue] sparc10 cpu - what to do.
mcguire at neurotica.com
Fri Dec 16 14:58:00 CST 2016
On 12/16/2016 02:14 PM, Liam Proven wrote:
>> The 80486 is little more than an 80386 with an 80387 on-chip. There
>> are other differences, but that's the main one.
> No, hang on, that is not accurate or fair.
Oh, here we go. Liam, I thought you had left that attitude on the
classiccmp list where it belongs.
Did you conveniently miss the part, still quoted above, when I said
"there are other differences"?
> The 386 is a simple, scalar 32-bit CPU.
> The 486 is pipelined -- it delivered roughly twice the
> instructions-per-clock of the 80386 -- as well as having on-board L1
> It was a lot more than a 386+387 on the same die, although the ISA was
> near identical.
There were something like two additional instructions, yes. And
you're correct about the pipelining and and cache. But I'd like to see
a 386 and a 486 side-by-side with the 486 doing twice as many
instructions per MHz than a 386. I've done those comparisons, albeit
for real (not benchmark-tuned) workloads, and that just doesn't wash.
The main performance benefit of the 486 was due to higher clock speeds,
which are due to process improvements over the intervening years.
> The Pentium Pro has instruction decomposition and reordering.
The PPro was the first of that family that I consider to be even
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
More information about the rescue