[rescue] sparc10 cpu - what to do.
mcguire at neurotica.com
Fri Dec 16 11:42:31 CST 2016
On 12/16/2016 09:13 AM, john wrote:
> I cannot remember the name of the thing, but what was interesting was
> that a Sparc2 could process the image in about 10% of the time it took
> on a 486.
Unsurprising; nearly every RISC processor trounced nearly every CISC
processor for nearly every type of workload in that era. It's still the
case for some types of workloads.
> I think the math co-processor was resident in the 486 chip by
> then, but if it wasn't, our test machine had one.
The 80486 is little more than an 80386 with an 80387 on-chip. There
are other differences, but that's the main one.
> the difference was so astonishing to us that we invested in a lot of
> dialogue with the developer who was also astonished. we supposed bad
> compiler fit with Intel, but developer who felt his future lay with
> intel, not sun, market was really focused on making it work with intel.
> And at the time, this was the best they could do.
It wasn't the compiler, it was the processor architecture.
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
More information about the rescue