[rescue] Sun Systems need to go away
peter at ashlyn.co.uk
Thu Feb 27 08:26:16 CST 2014
Ah, I understand.
On 27 Feb 2014, at 14:09, Lionel Peterson <lionel4287 at gmail.com> wrote:
> When the great consolidation occurs, the V240 will be the lone SPARC in the
> room, and I'd like to be able to put a head on it since when I run it, it
> primarily be as a desktop, not a server, and I'd like to be able to run it
> without needing a second machine to act as terminal/xterminal.
> For production use, I'm with you - the framebuffer doesn't make sense...
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Peter Stokes <peter at ashlyn.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi Lionel
>> Why the frame buffer? Never really understood why folk install them on
>> kind of system, especially with the ALOM port.
>>> On 27 Feb 2014, at 13:33, Lionel Peterson <lionel4287 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think when all is said and done, my V240 will be the only Sun/SPARC
>>> in my collection - it is well-equipped (Dual CPUs, 8 Gigs RAM and 4x 146
>>> SCSI drives) and it came with it's rack rails.
>>> I paid a little bit of money for it a couple years ago ($125 as described
>>> above), and 'invested' in a DVD drive upgrade and a yet-to-be-installed
>>>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 2:20 AM, Joshua Boyd <jdboyd at jdboyd.net> wrote:
>>>> Personally, I think the V240s are much nicer. All the power of a V210,
>>> without as much noise.
>>> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
>> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
More information about the rescue