[rescue] NeXTSTEP or OPENSTEP?
lproven at gmail.com
Sat Aug 9 09:41:11 CDT 2014
On 9 August 2014 16:16, Carl R. Friend <crfriend at rcn.com> wrote:
> Save for the original BIOS which was as closed an architecture
> or product as any. It took a clean-room blind rever-engineeering
> to clone the blasted thing which was a tour-de-force -- first one
> team produced a spec from the existing one, sometimes by observation
> if not outright disassembly, and then a completely different team
> to produce something that obeyed the spec produced by the first
> team. This torqued IBM off immensely, but due to the process they
> couldn't do anything about it.
A very good point, well made.
> I view the PC as the beginning of the end for interesting computing.
> Yes, it ultimately resulted in insanely cheap (in all meanings of the
> word) hardware, but also in a monoculture that is one well-written
> virus away from a global freeze of bibilcal proportions. Quite likely
> ARM may be the sole survivor.
Hmm! Interesting take, but I can't really disagree with you.
Liam Proven b" Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk b" GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com b" Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) b" +420 702 829 053 (DR)
More information about the rescue