[rescue] Sun Sparcstation 20 hard disks
adh at an.bradford.ma.us
Thu Aug 25 19:34:40 CDT 2011
" From: Phil Stracchino <alaric at metrocast.net>
" On 08/25/11 16:25, Mouse wrote:
" >>> Though seriously, I consider it within the bounds of possibility
" >>> that, assuming we do not suffer a civilization crash, by the time my
" >>> physical body's ability to sustain me is exhausted, we will have the
" >>> capability to opt for upload into zettabyte space.
" >> what bothers me about that is, it's like email - only a -copy- of the
" >> -original-, which still dies.
" > In a sense. But in some sense, we're all dying all the time.
we're also all regenerating all the time.
" > It's continuity of sense-of-self, which mostly means continuity of
" > memory, that I care about. If my mind can be moved to a silicon
" > substrate, I wouldn't care about the meat substrate I left behind any
" > more than I care about the way my current body's cells keep dying all
" > the time now.
" See, that's the thing. BACKWARD continuity is easy. It's relatively
" easy for the hardware-housed me-consciousness instance to wake up with
" all the memories and experiences of the wetware me-consciousness instance.
" What's hard is forward continuity - for the me-consciousness instance
" that is present in the wetware to go to sleep and wake up in the hardware.
" To look at it another way, copying is easy; moving is hard.
that is the very nub of my gist, if i may quote j. cleese... making a
copy then destroying the original - as in the star trek transporter -
may appear to have the same effect as moving to observers, but it's
very different for the principals involved.
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh at an.bradford.ma.us and think what none thought
More information about the rescue