alaric at metrocast.net
Fri Oct 30 06:34:40 CDT 2009
Skeezics Boondoggle wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Charles Monett wrote:
>>> Just a matter of opinion, isn't ~20ish ppm a bit low for printing speed?
>>> My experience has been that's the territory of the form printers and
>>> some B&W(HP 8500dn?) lasers.
>> 8500DN is an 11x17 color laser, and it's good for 24ppm in B/W. It's a
>> pretty serious departmental printer. What kind of size printer are you
>> used to that 20ppm is "a bit low"?
> Well, almost 30 years ago the Xerox 9700 could do 120ppm, and
> lower-end models could do 40-60ppm. The 9700 was a beast. It had a
> duty cycle of something like a million pages a month. Hell, they
> probably just fed whole trees in one end of the thing. :-)
Yeah, I wondered if Charles was thinking about something like that. We
had a big Xerox printer/copier at Cardima, eventually.
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
alaric at caerllewys.net alaric at metrocast.net phil at co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
More information about the rescue