[rescue] Electronics Recycling Day
francini at mac.com
Mon Nov 16 08:23:44 CST 2009
The CPU in the 725 was definitely the same as the 730; but the system
still clocked in as significantly slower than a 730. Probably the
slower disk had something to do with it...
Also, a MicroVAX II with sufficient RAM, an RD54 disk, and no other
users will perform a lot faster than an 11/780 with another 30 users
John Francini <francini at mac.com>
"I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a
disgrace; that two are called a law firm; and that three or more
become a Congress. And by God I have had *this* Congress!" --John Adams
On Nov 16, 2009, at 3:22, Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:
> der Mouse wrote:
>> Not the 725? I certainly recall the 725 as feeling slower than the
>> 730, but after this long it's certainly possible that I've got the
>> numbers wrong - or that the speed difference I noticed was at least
>> partly peripheral speed rather than CPU crunch.
> I think the CPU on the 725 is identical to that of the 730. It's
> just a different chassis.
> Peace... Sridhar
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
More information about the rescue