[rescue] Electronics Recycling Day

John Francini francini at mac.com
Mon Nov 16 08:23:44 CST 2009

The CPU in the 725 was definitely the same as the 730; but the system  
still clocked in as significantly slower than a 730. Probably the  
slower disk had something to do with it...

Also, a MicroVAX II with sufficient RAM, an RD54 disk, and no other  
users will perform a lot faster than an 11/780 with another 30 users  
on board.


John Francini <francini at mac.com>
"I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a  
disgrace; that two are called a law firm; and that three or more  
become a Congress. And by God I have had *this* Congress!" --John Adams

On Nov 16, 2009, at 3:22, Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:

> der Mouse wrote:
>> Not the 725?  I certainly recall the 725 as feeling slower than the
>> 730, but after this long it's certainly possible that I've got the
>> numbers wrong - or that the speed difference I noticed was at least
>> partly peripheral speed rather than CPU crunch.
> I think the CPU on the 725 is identical to that of the 730.  It's  
> just a different chassis.
> Peace...  Sridhar
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue

More information about the rescue mailing list