[rescue] SunBlade 2000 vs SunBlade 2500 vs Ultra 45
alaric at metrocast.net
Mon Aug 3 11:28:16 CDT 2009
Jonathan Patschke wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Itanium, realistically, sucked from day one. It cannot reasonably be
>> described as having ever been a successful processor.
> Say whaaaat?
> The 1.5GHz Itanium 2 CPUs (released 2003) in my rx2600 are just barely
> beaten by 2.6GHz CPUs (released 2006) in my Mac Pro. That is, running
> Mathematica's benchmark on a Mac Pro ranks it just 20% faster than a
> rx2600 per core. I'm not entirely sure, but I would assume the benchmark
> does not use a large enough dataset to thrash the memory bus.
Oh, sure, the processor *works*. I didn't mean to imply it didn't. But
it so failed to meet its expectations for market penetration that even
Intel sighed, conceded the inevitable, and followed the amd64 lead.
> Early on, this was true because the compilers for the platform had not
Indeed. A lot hadn't matured early on, and by the time it did finally
mature, the market passed it by. That was my primary point. It
*works*, but its overcomplexity prevented it from being a commercial
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
alaric at caerllewys.net alaric at metrocast.net phil at co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
More information about the rescue