[rescue] AS/400? Anyone?
Jonathan C. Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Thu Jan 17 23:30:20 CST 2008
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
>> They had AS/400 CPUs. They were CISC CPUs based off the design of
>> the System/38 processors, but with a System/370-ish instruction set
>> (underneath the portability layer).
> That's an interesting question. If the POWER processors were extended to
> add the necesary instructions to run AS400 code, are they AS400's or
They're POWER architecture systems running POWER code.
AS/400 systems (under OS/400 anyway) do not run processor-native code.
They run code written against a 128-bit virtual machine architecture.
This virtual machine architecture was ported to POWER.
> Do they run OS400?
> Do they actually run the code natively or is it some form of hardware
> enhnaced emulation?
They run it as natively as the original AS/400s did. The original
AS/400 systems were a 48-bit CISC system hardware-wise, but the VM was a
128-bit memory-mapped-everything architecture. The new ones are a
64-bit RISC system running the same VM architecture.
More information about the rescue