[rescue] has anyone used >72GB drives in a 280R?
mrbill at mrbill.net
Mon Oct 29 10:44:11 CDT 2007
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:40:32AM -0500, Doug Simmons wrote:
> Sun says that anything over 72gb in a 280r is an unsupported
> configuration. But, is it a POSSIBLE unsupported configuration?
Of course - they only list 72G because that's the highest-capacity
disk drive that THEY SOLD for use in a 280R.
Same way I don't think they list >36G as supported in a U5/U10 -
they never sold that config, so they don't support it.
I've put 144G (142G?) drives in a Blade 1000 and they work just fine.
More information about the rescue