[rescue] OS X is certified UNIX
bdwheele at indiana.edu
Thu Jun 14 10:14:29 CDT 2007
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 10:09 -0500, Brian Deloria wrote:
> There's XP "WoW" and XP64. My understanding is that until you exceed the
> 4GB barrier of memory utilization there is no cost benefit but rather a loss
> in performance, or at least so sayeth the Unigraphics guys.
The numbers I've seen on non-windows machines show better performance in
64-bit mode over 32-bit. Having 8 extra registers makes the code
> On 6/14/07, Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Devin Ganger wrote:
> > > On 6/13/07 5:26 PM, "Phil Stracchino" <phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've heard it said what w2K3 Server actually performs better for gaming
> > >> than W2K. Can anyone else corroborate or refute this?
> > >
> > > It's true, at least in my experience -- depending on the game, of
> > course.
> > > For the most part, W2K3 just flat performs better than W2K.
> > What about XP Pro x64? It's based on the W2K3 code-base, not the XP
> > code-base. Although the 64-bit support might make it a bit less
> > memory-efficient.
> > Peace... Sridhar
> > _______________________________________________
> > rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
More information about the rescue