[rescue] printing alternatives?
lionel4287 at verizon.net
Fri Jul 6 17:48:48 CDT 2007
>From: Robert Darlington <rdarlington at gmail.com>
>Date: 2007/07/06 Fri PM 02:26:40 CDT
>To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
>Subject: Re: [rescue] printing alternatives?
>Well, after trying basically everything mentioned above, seeing that
>the only Linux kernels that run on it are those heavily modified by
>the original Cobalt developers, and that even these kernels are
>horribly outdated, the best thing for this RaQ4 is a heavy dose of
>Tannerite at the target range. It's to big to be a door stop or
>On 7/6/07, Lionel Peterson <lionel4287 at verizon.net> wrote:
>> >From: Robert Darlington <rdarlington at gmail.com>
>> >Date: 2007/07/06 Fri PM 12:46:38 CDT
>> >To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
>> >Subject: Re: [rescue] printing alternatives?
>> >The RaQ 4 is a K6-2 CPU.
>> >RaQ 3/4 Note
>> >Note that the i386-based RaQ 3, RaQ 3i and RaQ 4 models are not
>> >supported by the cobalt port.
>> >I think I'm up a creek, and I guess I can use this box as a paddle!
>> >When the day comes to throw it out, I will mail the list.
>> NuOnce Blue Quartz?
>> Link: http://www.nuonce.net/bluequartz.php
The latest bluequartz version is based on Centos 4.5, and was updated as of June 1, 2007 - that seems pretty recent/current to me, but YMMV...
I may try it again on a "plain" PC - it installs on almost anything, even Dell ;^)
More information about the rescue