[rescue] Sun announces DST patch availablity...
adh at an.bradford.ma.us
Tue Jan 30 20:41:38 CST 2007
" From: David Muran-de Assereto <dmuran at tuad.org>
" On Jan 30, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Sandwich Maker wrote:
" > <snip>
" > if they're preloading the systems, it's entirely possible they could
" > use the old driver with a newer kernel, though they'd have to hack the
" > installation script accordingly.
" They won't do that because it's not a "supported configuration". DoD
" CM rules forbid it.
for some value of 'supported' that doesn't recognize os eol... well,
that's our govt all over.
" > " Government-sponsored development and procurement are severely broken
" > " for information tech.
" > there can be other issues. i just helped a friend quote a bid for an
" > faa system. they were going for used/refurb because system
" > reliability is critical [sounds odd doesn't it?] and they've only
" > tested/qualified -this- configuration. the hardware is mostly eol and
" > going for newer hardware would invoke the test cycle all over again.
" Agreed, for things like legacy safety-of-flight or nuclear surety.
" There's a LOT of testing that goes into that and it's very expensive,
" so upgrades are avoided until there's a really good reason to do so.
" Unfortunately, the majority of the systems I have to "secure" are
" simply systems mired in an old, poorly managed funding and
" development cycle with insane lead times and very poor funding.
" And of course, the Admiral needs it right now, anyway, so there's no
" time to upgrade.
" To re-phrase and reiterate, DoD procurement is broken, especially for
i see your point. they're just not ready to grasp that it tech moves
so fast. they probably think that a destroyer lifetime of 20y is
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh at an.bradford.ma.us and think what none thought
More information about the rescue