[rescue] 480Mhz Cpu's in an Ultra 2 Chasis? Can it be done?
lionel4287 at verizon.net
Sun Feb 18 19:55:27 CST 2007
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 15:49, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> Sun, 18 Feb 2007 @ 12:46 -0500, Phil Stracchino said:
> > Lionel Peterson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 17:24, Bill Bradford wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 04:59:42PM -0500, Lionel Peterson wrote:
> > >>> Integrated framebuffer - this uses an Intel chipset ;^)
> > >> Hardly. 8-) It's one of the "Niagara" T1000 servers.
> > >
> > > So what, this system isn't "Vista Ready"? Why would anyone buy (or
> > > accept) a system that isn't "Vista Ready"? ;^)
> > Personally, I would file "not Vista ready" under "redeeming qualities". ;)
> Understand the joke, but on a more serious note "Vista Ready" machines
> are pretty nice as long as you don't run Vista on them.
> I know I sure would like to have another Vista Ready system... so I
> could run UNIX on it.
> Better yet, MacOS... but I don't see that happening no matter what
> Dvorak spews... :)
If my Mac Book Pro had a bigger video card (more memory), I think it
would qualify as Vista Ready - that would be a fun sticker to put on the
I'm about to put Solaris x86 on my Mac Book Pro with Parallels - should
be interesting - anyone else played with that? I was jazzed to see they
mention Solaris right on the outside of the box, like *real* folks would
buy it for that reason...
More information about the rescue