[rescue] Sun wants money for patch bundles?
mj at turner.org.za
Sat Apr 14 03:45:08 CDT 2007
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:15:39AM +0200, Andrew Gaylard wrote:
> Another question: it seems that Sun doesn't require a contract
> for any patches for Solaris-10. Is this correct? Is it likely to
> remain this way?
When I last looked, all but critical security patches for Solaris 10
required a support contract, but that may have changed (particularly in
light of the recent changes in patch policy for Solaris 9 and earlier).
> If so, then I'd happily upgrade, except that I'm told that my Ultra-2/200
> can't run Solaris-10. Or is that problem fixed nowadays?
Yep, unfortunately the UltraSPARC-I CPUs aren't officially supported by
Solairs 10. There is an unofficial workaround (that I can pass along if
you're interested), but I've not tried it myself. NetBSD will run nicely on
that machine though, heh.
> I assume that with Solaris becoming open-sourced, charging
> bucks for fixes will not be sustainable. I for one would happily
> roll my own, in that case.
Indeed. The only problem is that Sun don't release patches for OpenSolaris
Community Edition - upgrades are full OS updates, rather than individual
patches. Rather annoying...
Michael-John Turner | http://mjturner.net/
mj at turner.org.za | Open Source in WC ZA - http://www.clug.org.za/
More information about the rescue