[rescue] My new UltraSparc 5's, also my first Sun stations
Charles Shannon Hendrix
shannon at widomaker.com
Tue Jun 7 09:03:02 CDT 2005
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 @ 20:43 -0400, Patrick Giagnocavo said:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:03:20PM -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> > A lot of developers don't seem to care how well software like Gnome runs
> > on anything less than a 0-2 year old PC, and from discussions I've read
> > a lot of people no longer even think about how things will run remotely.
> > For example, if your application is dependent on things like DGA and
> > local shared memory, it won't run remotely.
> DGA is inherently non-networkable, so there really is nothing you can
> do about that. Personally I think it is/was a dumb idea to require
> it, but I am no genius X programmer so maybe it solves a real need.
It solves a real need: performance.
Since the apps that need it generally won't run or run poorly over a
network, I don't believe they consider it worthwhile to make it work
over a network.
The problem as I see it is the use of such accelerations creeping into
even application and other software. It's OK if it is optional, but I
think we are not far away from even server systems being GUI dependent,
and requiring local displays.
Yes, I think people are that dumb.
Also, even with plain remote terminals, a lot of applications eat up
tons of X memory. I tried to deploy some X terminals with 64MB of RAM,
and found that a lot of apps used that up rather quickly.
shannon "AT" widomaker.com -- ["Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny." --
More information about the rescue