[rescue] Cleaning out, anyone want some FREE stuff?
nimitz at nimitzbrood.com
Thu Jan 13 09:45:28 CST 2005
>> SGI machines IMHO are not "better" just "different". SGI machines
>> excel at graphics rendering and video editing - with the right
>> hardware installed.Sun machines perform best, again IMHO, at heavy
>> mathematical simulation
>> and database work.Each has their own arena.
> Challenge XL? Origin 2000? I came from a shop that used almost all of
> the SGI's headless, and tehy were nothing but number crunchers (NASA
I''ll buy that but remember that you mentioned Indy in the second half of
this which is why I focused on desktop units.
> This was before SGI's downfall.
Urrgh. Dont remind me.
>> Ummm...Bzzt! ;-) I personally own a 1xx R4400 that came stock with
>> one of the two Indy systems I own. As for Sun they have always had
>> more processor upgrade options than SGI for the most part. It all
>> depends on models, dates, times, and other ephemera.
> The Ross's are 3rd party though. And Sun had way more marketshare.
Yes but for the most part neither Sun or SGI _needed_ cpu upgrades if run
properly and in their own level of load. It's all a balance thing.
"I think we used too much!" - Chris Knight
More information about the rescue