[rescue] The best 'rescue' workstation

Jeffrey Nonken jjn_rescue at nonken.net
Wed Apr 27 09:39:15 CDT 2005

At 09:53 AM 4/27/2005, Peter Corlett wrote:
> > 512k still sounds like a lack of cache to me. Some might even call
> > it crippling.
>It's generally enough for worms and spyware, which is all Windows
>users seem to run on their Celeron systems anyway.

Now now, be nice.

Some of us run anti-virus, anti-spyware, anti-popup, and software firewall 
instead. It may be slow, but at least it's expensive.

More information about the rescue mailing list