[rescue] Sun's new policy sucks...
mvergall at pandora.be
Thu Apr 7 16:44:21 CDT 2005
Patrick wrote :
> What do you mean? If it's installing dependencies, it's likely because
> the package you're installing depends on libraries (or binaries or
> something) from the other ones to be available.... I haven't seen a
> whole lot of 'unreasonable' dependancies. There's a few things that
> depend on X that could have been compiled without support for it, but
> I'm willing to be most people rather have the additional support
> compiled in than not (and it's not as if you couldn't recompile the
> package yourself to not require such things).
I've found however for my requirements that having X installed is not
feaseble at all due to disk space. I run a couple of boxes that don't
need X like name servers, firewalls, NAT's,even mailservers.I switched
to NetBSD because i.m.h.o it has a cleaner and leaner design to it. Also
I'm a purist in the way that if I don't compile the lot from scratch I don't
trust it becuase the code was probably compiled without the correct optimisation,
so I don't like the fact that you can't simply re-compile debian like you can a *BSD
flavoured system. The only problem is that for now NetBSD dousn't function on SMP Ultra's.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 4/6/2005
More information about the rescue