[rescue] Is anyone running netalk on solaris 9 sparc?
mcguire at neurotica.com
Mon Mar 15 01:14:54 CST 2004
On Mar 14, 2004, at 2:44 PM, Steve Sandau wrote:
> I take it that "64-bit capable" is a better descsription than plain
> 64-bit? I assume then that it makes either 64-bit or 32-bit
> executables. And, just because the 32-bit gcc can make a 64-bit gcc
> doesn't mean that it can make a 64-bit anything-else, right?
Well it doesn't matter what the compiler is running *on*...only what
it's told to generate code for. Heck, I frequently run GCC on an
UltraSPARC and tell it to generate binaries for a 68K.
I've not messed with GCC on an UltraSPARC for quite a while (I
ditched it in codegen frustration in preference to Sun's compilers),
but if memory serves, a GCC built for an UltraSPARC target can generate
either 32- or 64-bit binaries. I'm not 100% positive of this, but I
believe that's the case.
Dave McGuire "PC users only know two 'solutions'...
Cape Coral, FL reboot and upgrade." -Jonathan Patschke
More information about the rescue