[rescue] Re: Low Cost Postscript printer in US

Andrew Weiss ajwdsp at cloud9.net
Sat Feb 21 18:42:39 CST 2004

On Feb 21, 2004, at 4:21 AM, Gavin Hubbard wrote:

> My advice is to stay away from any B&W laser printer that HP produced 
> after
> the LJ 4100. The reason is that prior to that point HP only used Canon 
> print
> engines in their laser printers. After that point they started using a 
> print
> engine that they designed in-house and, quite frankly, the new engines 
> are
> junk. The new low-cost colour laser printers also use an HP engine, 
> and IMO
> are especially bad.
Have you seen their newest printers?.... Those are the ugliest and  
cheapest looking printers I've ever seen them make.  They look like a 
cross between a marshmallow and a Pac Man ghost.  Their entire line of 
new products looks cheap (flimsy and bad not low cost) and ugly.


More information about the rescue mailing list