[rescue] PC100 vs PC 133

Samuel Kopel kopel at vex.net
Sun Feb 8 20:50:15 CST 2004

And don't forget the cheap PC 133(only) memory that is not backwards
compatible regardless of what system you put it into.


On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Peter Corlett wrote:

> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 01:23:20 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Peter Corlett <abuse at cabal.org.uk>
> Reply-To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
> To: rescue at sunhelp.org
> Newsgroups: newsgate.sun-rescue
> Subject: Re: [rescue] The FrankenPIX is complete!
> Bill Bradford  <mrbill at mrbill.net> wrote:
> [...]
> > I think if I can find a good source of PC100 RAM,
> Yes, it's called anywhere that sells PC133 RAM. That'll be Dabs, Scan, CCL,
> Light, and pretty much every other boxshifter out there.
> Are there really systems out there that require PC100 and won't work with
> PC133?
> --
> When I was in the USAF, there was a modem I did battle with, which used (brace
> yourselves) mechanical resonators and a glowbottle circuit as an oscillator.
> There _really_ _was_ a "Kick here" spot on the front panel, lower left corner,
> and the resonator was just behind it.	- Mike Andrews in The Other Place
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue

More information about the rescue mailing list