[rescue] Compaq Proliant 8000
mcguire at neurotica.com
Fri Apr 30 11:48:07 CDT 2004
On Apr 30, 2004, at 12:40 PM, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
>>> Evidently you don't either since you think a 300MHz Sun with low
>>> end graphics is as fast as a desktop PC.
>> Ahh, the megahertz myth rears its ugly head.
> Well, on every benchmark I've tried doing, I've discovered that
> Ultrasparc seems to *completely suck* for computationally intensive
> tasks. Compared, of course, to an RS/6000 with a POWER processor (or
> even a G4 mac).
> BTW, what I tested was a single-threaded benchmark on a 1.2GHz
> UltraSparc III+ in a Sun F6800. One benchmark put it on par with a
> 200MHz POWER-3 based RS/6000. I tried both GCC and figuring it was
> outputting horrible code, Sun's CC. Sun's compiler wasn't much faster.
> Sun is good for I/O but crappy for computing things (quickly). Of
> course, desktop applications don't require either.
Actually, take a closer look at your benchmarks. Where SPARC falls
down is floating-point performance. The integer performance is quite
good. The FP performance has, historically, always sucked.
Which, for me, is fine...because I have Machines (with a capital "M")
which are *only* good for serious FP.
Dave McGuire "PC users only know two 'solutions'...
Cape Coral, FL reboot and upgrade." -Jonathan Patschke
More information about the rescue