[rescue] Compaq Proliant 8000
mcguire at neurotica.com
Thu Apr 29 18:22:49 CDT 2004
On Apr 29, 2004, at 4:36 PM, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
>> Perhaps this is just a matter of the redefinition of the term "failed"
>> to mean "didn't replace x86"...which it wasn't designed to do in the
>> first place!
> When I was in college, and in my first job after college, Intel reps
> came to talk to us. In college, they specifically pushed i860 as an
> alternative. The literature also said "80960" which kind of emphasized
> the point. They were talking about how the i860 was the first of a new
I will flame about the rest of your email later, but for now I feel
compelled to say that this has *zero* to do with it. *ALL* of Intel's
processors part numbers start with "80" except the 4004. There might
be one or two other exceptions, but I can't think of any at the moment.
8008, 8080, 8085, x86 (etc etc...although the Pentium is 80501/80502
and a bunch of others), 8031, 8041, 8048, 8051, 80750, 80860, 80960,
Dave McGuire "PC users only know two 'solutions'...
Cape Coral, FL reboot and upgrade." -Jonathan Patschke
More information about the rescue