ethernet and switches, was Re: [rescue] Mozilla Firefox
mcguire at neurotica.com
Thu Apr 22 21:25:17 CDT 2004
On Apr 22, 2004, at 9:49 PM, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
>>> OK... but what is the proper solution there?
>>> I don't really see how ethernet could have survived without violating
>> I think you just answered your own question. Long live FDDI!
> I don't think FDDI is a panacae either.
There is no panacea. No networking technology is perfect for every
> I also don't think it ever had a chance against ethernet in the
In what marketplace? It was the mainstay of core networking for a
long time. Cisco specifically steered people away from FDDI for what
seemed to be political reasons, and since (like it or not) Cisco gear
is the mainstay of core networking, they successfully tanked FDDI. At
least, for what people are purchasing new equipment to build. FDDI
still moves packets just fine, regardless of what some company's sales
droids would rather sell you.
> I don't think ethernet is near as bad as its opponents say it is.
BZZZT. We can go into details if you like. I'm not sure you want to
go down that road tonight, though, because I'm in a really special
> Most of them say it cannot do things it does daily.
Well *I* certainly haven't said that. It does move data. For that
matter, so does Windows...and like Ethernet, it doesn't do it very
Dave McGuire "PC users only know two 'solutions'...
Cape Coral, FL reboot and upgrade." -Jonathan Patschke
More information about the rescue