[rescue] Advice on Octanes
kurt at k-huhn.com
Tue Sep 23 21:46:55 CDT 2003
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:36:08 -0400
> I'm of the same opinion. I love my Octane and use it
> as my main workstation, but my 1999 era, PC100, dual P3
> 450 Slack box downstairs is much faster for many tasks
> (most of my apps aren't using both CPUs so i don't
> believe that is where the edge lies.) For instance, if
> i want to crypt a file with gpg, if it's over 30 megs
> or so, i move it to the P3 to, do the math and move it
That's pretty odd. What do the time comparisons look like?
> on my x86 stuff. If i had to choose between them,
> Octane all the way, but i'm not going to lie to myself
> and say it's faster for *my* tasks.
Certainly not. For some stuff, apparently what I use it for, the Octane
is far better/faster. YMMV. Results not typical. Side effects
minimal. Use only as directed.
Kurt "You're all bastards! MTV sucks! We hates you all!"
kurt at k-huhn.com -- Gollum
More information about the rescue