[rescue] spam WPOISON
alaric at caerllewys.net
Tue Sep 9 09:38:35 CDT 2003
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:01:47AM -0400, sammy ominsky wrote:
> On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Jonathan C. Patschke wrote:
> >no reason that someone can't write a program that does the same thing
> >with a less demanding license.
> Like this?
I just installed sugarplum last night (installation took about 15
minutes, mostly spent in hand-editing install.sh and httpd.conf). It
seems to work fine, and the teergrube (tarpit) support is nice. I don't
have extra IPs to run a tarpit on right now, so I just pointed the
teergrube addresses at my other domain, babcom.com, which I abandoned
for email purposes in February and which is MX'd directly into Spamcop
as a known-clean spam feed.
I don't know if there's any point to running more than one on a site.
This one looks reasonably valid too. I concur with the argument that
WPOISON's author has missed the point -- the logo and link requirements
are like a big neon sign saying "Don't spider this site, it's poisoned."
.********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. *********.
: phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek :
: alaric at caerllewys.net : alaric-ruthven at earthlink.net : phil at latt.net :
: 2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold) :
: Linux Now! ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. :
More information about the rescue