[rescue] SunFastEthernet questions
Jonathan C. Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Tue Sep 2 17:50:29 CDT 2003
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
> >And after setting them to 100/full you'll probably get about double that.
> They are at 100/full via autonegotiate... I checked my 2924XL.. there
> are three ports in use currently... and all are at 100/full.
Yes. Same situation here. What do you expect it to tell you?
HME is -not- -reliable- in autoneg mode. This is a very well-known
problem. It will work, yes, but the connection doesn't approach its
full potential throughput.
> >FTP is a good benchmark because it uses TCP streams and relatively
> >little CPU.
> Yes, but isn't the protocol exchange got more overhead and smaller
> transfers than other protocols ???
Okay, HTTP, then. Pick a protocol, any protocol. For the purpose of a
"is it faster after I tinkered with things?" experiment, the actual
protocol doesn't matter. My 100baseTX network can move data faster
than 4.6M/s via FTP. When things were set to autoneg, it could not. In
fact, the performance I saw was below that mark. YMMV, but I've seen
this consistently wherever hme cards are involved.
Jonathan Patschke ) "Gamer weenies...are the sludge at the bottom
Elgin, TX ( of the user swamp." --Gary Nichols
More information about the rescue