[rescue] Bigger Iron at Home (was: SNMP, Baby!)
kurt at k-huhn.com
Wed Nov 12 17:11:27 CST 2003
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Francisco Javier Mesa-Martinez wrote:
> Unless you can thread your code very well, and that is a very big IF,
> a quad R4K machine is not going to be that impressive. On an extrictly
> wats per computation ratio that is....
But I'm not interested in that, or why it's not the fastest thing on the
planet. I could use it, it would fit my needs nicely, and I like them.
At the end of the day, isn't that what really counts? That you *like*
Kurt "I'm utterly clueless...."
kurt at k-huhn.com Verisign VP Chuck Gomes
More information about the rescue