[rescue] Bigger Iron at Home (was: SNMP, Baby!)
jdboyd at ohno.mrbill.net
Wed Nov 12 16:36:31 CST 2003
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:17:42PM -0800, Francisco Javier Mesa-Martinez wrote:
> > > It's a 4-processor R4k-150 ...
> > Certainly nothing to sneeze at. I'd like one....
> Unless you can thread your code very well, and that is a very big IF, a
> quad R4K machine is not going to be that impressive. On an extrictly wats
> per computation ratio that is....
Won't a make -j 5 take fair advantage of that?
Of course, such a machine could also be an incentive to study efficient
More information about the rescue