[rescue] Exabyte 8500S - oui ou non?
alaric at caerllewys.net
Wed Nov 12 10:48:36 CST 2003
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:48:05PM +0100, Jochen Kunz wrote:
> On 2003.11.12 16:20 Sheldon T. Hall wrote:
> > If the drive itself is OK, I'd like to use it, but I can't get much of
> > a feeling for the reliability and interchangesability of the thing.
> To my experience Exabytes are better then DATs, but by far not that
> reliable like DLT or QIC (SLR/MLR). I would not use an Exabyte for
> mission critical purposes.
Plenty of sites have used Exabyte drives in mission-critical applications.
The Exabyte is a perfectly good drive, but in this day and age an 8500
is frankly so small that the question is whether it's *worth* using it.
There's a comic-relief factor in shuttling tapes in and out by the
bucketload to back up a single desktop PC, but it doesn't make a lot of
.********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. *********.
: phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek :
: alaric at caerllewys.net : alaric-ruthven at earthlink.net : phil at latt.net :
: 2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold) :
: Linux Now! ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. :
More information about the rescue