[rescue] Re: G5 case

Eric Dittman dittman at dittman.net
Wed Jun 25 11:29:29 CDT 2003

> > And it must be pointed out that the 2.2, 2.0, and 1.2 kernels had similar
> > teething troubles in the first few releases. Characterizing the 2.4 kernel
> > as a "fiasco" is completely false.
> Yes, but in the earlier series of stable kernels, they weren't doing active
> development on it replacing large chunks of the core infrastructure. But in
> 2.4, the VM subsystem was ripped out and replaced with a new one, and the
> kernel developers aren't exactly convinced that the new one is better.

You mean "... and SOME of the kernel developers...".
The opinions are varied.
Eric Dittman
dittman at dittman.net

More information about the rescue mailing list