[rescue] Re: G5 case
Jonathan C. Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Tue Jun 24 22:36:47 CDT 2003
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Kevin wrote:
> personally, they would all be collecting much dust
> without the "userland from a few hundred different
> sources" SGI freeware.
That4s a bit different. mkfs, your core utilities (such as ls, dd, and
so on), your X11 distribution, and your core runtime libraries all come
from SGI. On Linux, the kernel team -only- works on the kernel. The
C runtime comes from GNU, the X11 distribution comes from XFree, the
init system comes from I have no idea whom.
Even in the case of the BSDs, which use a lot of GNU software, the code
is continually "BSDified" by the maintainer of whichever OS you're
using. OpenBSD, for example has made a lot of extensions to GCC to
support their new "W^X" security model and other OS niftiness.
> I do see much value in, and support, the "one company
> making the hardware and software" concept. I just
> don't subscribe to the idea that that is the only way
> things can work well.
Me, neither. Note that I never said Linux doesn't work well. It just
isn't as polished and seamless as what I'm used to. Using IRIX,
Solaris, or one of the BSDs is like reading a large tome written by one
author. Using a Linux distribution is like reading a collection of
short stories; while the underlying theme may be the same, it's clearly
not one contiguous work.
Jonathan Patschke ) "Leave your lawsuits at home. I have guns."
Elgin, TX ( --"Kountry" Mike Lundgren
More information about the rescue