[rescue] Stupid Solaris Net Install Problem
kloch at gurunet.net
Tue Jun 24 10:22:27 CDT 2003
Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Dave McGuire wrote:
>>>No friggin idea. I mean, it says LX on it. I had never heard of an
>>>until I also saw it in that document...
>> I've never heard of an LX+ either. I'm suspicious.
> It gets better. Look at the FEH up on sunsolve for the LX part
> of the handbook. It lists the LX and a ZX. Only ZX I've ever
> heard of is the Leo graphics board, but that is NOT what the
> FEH is talking about...
Maybe an LX+ is an LX with the 1M Vsimm so it can do
higher resolution (+ usually means that with sun framebuffers).
Maybe ZX was supposed to be an LX with a Leo board.
Speaking of '+', when my cg12 is recognized by solaris2.x,
it says something like "... is a cg12+" Does that mean
it does higher resolution than a regular cg12? The
handbook only has info on the regular cg12, which
matches the part number I have.
More information about the rescue