[rescue] 1600SW and refresh rates
kurt at csh.rit.edu
Fri Jun 20 13:57:52 CDT 2003
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:13:08AM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > Feh. FVWM is for the weak. twm all the way =)
> Wimp. What's the matter, you couldn't write your own? :)
No, I couldn't =) For insane minimalism, try wmx. I had a
friend using it for a while. He talked about the "magic
configuration symlink". They embedded the configuration
in a symlink, because reading a symlink is one system
call whereas opening, reading and closing a file is 3 =)
> > And yes, I DO still use twm.
> Me too, though I like its cousins vtwm and ctwm. ctwm is crash happy on
> my system though. Not sure what's up with that.
I used tvtwm for quite a while and loved it. Nowadays I don't
do as much with virtual desktops...
More information about the rescue