[rescue] Perverse Question
alaric at caerllewys.net
Thu Jun 19 23:18:11 CDT 2003
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:53:24PM -0400, Sheldon T. Hall wrote:
> It was not at all unusual for things to come up "out of balance" because of
> transactions that got made-cancelled-remade and where one of the steps got
> bollixed up, or because of storage read/write problems. When that happened,
> we were supposed to find the transaction (easy if it as an odd amount like
> $136.47, but near impossible if it was $100.00), _edit_the_transaction_ to
> make things balance, and re-run all the batches.
> Of course, if we didn't have time to re-run all the batches, we'd just edit
> the master record, too.
> The only record of this was the console log, which was on paper. [...]
The possibilities for embezzlement inherent in this process seem nothing
short of staggering. Did anyone ever try to exploit this?
.********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. *********.
: phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek :
: alaric at caerllewys.net : alaric-ruthven at earthlink.net : phil at latt.net :
: 2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold) :
: Linux Now! ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. :
More information about the rescue