[rescue] Perverse Question
rnovak at indyramp.com
Sun Jun 15 21:12:09 CDT 2003
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Eric Josephson wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Robert Novak wrote:
> > I suspect most of the network itself runs on mc68k and powerpc on cPCI and
> > similar blades, running code developed under Wind River or Greenhills (or
> > something green).
> I know Watchguard used vxWorks (Wind River) in their SOHO, but not in
> anything that needed performance. I heard a lot of dissing of the
> vxWorks network stack, so I'm kind of surprised it would be used in
> anything but X servers or low-end network appliances.
I heard a lot of dissing of everything. I'm kind of surprised that
anything is used for anything.
One previous employer got very good performance out of Wind River/vxworks
for PowerPC 603/604. Routing full-bore 100TX on 48 ports per board can
strain things a bit, but we did it. Other companies have too. I don't
remember what development environment Cisco uses, but I think it's one of
I suspect it depends on how you develop for it. You could probably write
a VAX assembler routine that would be dog slow for doing a binsort.
Doesn't mean the VAX assembler can't be used for anything more
substantial. Just means ya can't code. :)
Or in short, YMMV.
Robert Novak - rnovak at indyramp.com
More information about the rescue