[rescue] Perverse Question
J. Alexander Jacocks
jjacocks at mac.com
Mon Jun 9 15:59:16 CDT 2003
>On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>>> 9 is supposed to be faster in general... does that help on the LX?
>>> And I definitely would NOT be running X on the machine...
>I've never run 9 on an LX, but 2.6 was a dog. 7 was a dog. 8 was two
>three-legged dogs fighting over an old sock. 9 is probably better.
9 runs well on my Classic doing service as a firewall/router. I have to
grab the qe driver from 8 02/02, but no troubles other than that.
More information about the rescue