[rescue] Perverse Question

J. Alexander Jacocks jjacocks at mac.com
Mon Jun 9 15:59:16 CDT 2003

 >On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
 >>> 9 is supposed to be faster in general... does that help on the LX?
 >>> And I definitely would NOT be running X on the machine...
 >I've never run 9 on an LX, but 2.6 was a dog.  7 was a dog.  8 was two
 >three-legged dogs fighting over an old sock.  9 is probably better.

9 runs well on my Classic doing service as a firewall/router.  I have to 
grab the qe driver from 8 02/02, but no troubles other than that.

More information about the rescue mailing list