[rescue] Spam (was: Perverse Question)
alaric at caerllewys.net
Sat Jun 7 23:58:51 CDT 2003
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:50:17PM -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> Combine it with a reverse MX for each hop in the headers and it should
> be nearly foolproof.
> However, this is a big traffic increase.
It would, and a significant processing overhead .... however, my
thought is that if we can kill the spam, the gains in both from killing
the spam would outweigh the costs in overhead. Overall, we'd end up
with less CPU cycles and less bandwidth burned.
.********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. *********.
: phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek :
: alaric at caerllewys.net : alaric-ruthven at earthlink.net : phil at latt.net :
: 2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold) :
: Linux Now! ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. :
More information about the rescue