IOS (was Re: [rescue] Being jobless)
Daniel de Young
daniel at velvetsea.com
Wed Jul 30 13:25:29 CDT 2003
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 10:36, Jonathan C. Patschke wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
> > I like IOS, but it is inconsistent... especially some of the IOS versions
> > for switches,
> Oh, yeah, I'd forgotten about that abomination. The IOS for LD and
> IOS-alike for PIX are ever so much worse. In an LD, when you enter
> configuration mode, you can run normal exec-mode commands AND
> configuration commands, but you can't run configuration commands from
> vanilla exec-mode.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't both Catalyst and PIX bought from
other companies? Looks like... buy and then "extend" and OS to look a
little MORE like IOS than maybe it should.
What's a real trip is working with their Layer 3 blades on a CAT. Two
OSs on the same device. First time I did that, it was like getting my
> And let's not even talk about the omission of the -telnet- command in
> PIX's IOS-alike.
Personally, I'm glad PIX doesn't have telnet. Telnet should be going
the way of the dodo just... about... now. Would have been nice if they
did a better job integrating ssh into PIX though. I see your point on
those grounds, but running a firewall access password in plaintext over
*any* network is not something that should be a "feature". Just the
thought of all those people who would IF they could makes me kind of
sick to my stomach. Heck, I might even be lured into doing it "in a
pinch". Overall... good move on their part. Console ports on nearby
boxen are cheap and you can always ssh to them.
More information about the rescue