[rescue] ZX and Turbo ZX differences?
james at foonly.com
Tue Jan 21 23:10:37 CST 2003
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Robert Reif wrote:
> I just picked up a turbo ZX frame buffer to replace the ZX in my
> 600MP and was wondering what the differences are. A web
> search only finds power and heat differences. There must be a
> reason for the turbo ZX to use more power.
The TZX had a considerably faster XGL pipeline. I think that 2D is
comparable. TGS had a nice OpenGL pipeline for it, stock Solaris support
will be XGL only.
Note, though, that the TZX is actually a set of sbus cards (one doublewide
graphics card, two fan cards), and is designed to be used only in the
SS10/SS20 where the fan cards can sit above the main graphics card. The
fan cards also supposedly feed additional power to the graphics card,
though I don't know if this is vital or just provides extra margin.
Your 4/600 may have enough cooling to handle the main board without the
fan cards, the VME crates moved a lot of air. If you don't have the fan
cards, I'd recommend sticking an instant-read thermometer on one of the
heatsinked chips and seeing where it stabilizes. External package
temperatures much over 60C are usually bad news.
More information about the rescue