[rescue] OT: Linux and USB on Intel
mike at blackhairy.demon.co.uk
Sun Apr 20 16:54:36 CDT 2003
On Sunday 20 April 2003 21:44, Dave McGuire wrote:
> Yeah but then you've lost the cost advantage. Those big,
> full-of-empty-space "server" x86 systems are really fucking expensive,
> more so than a lot of "real computers".
In most cases you're probably right. Most of the time I don't bother looking
at x86 hardware, but in 1 specific specialised case it worked out to be
cheaper than Sun. Although improvements at the low end of Sun's line may mean
it's no longer the case.
3 of my x86 servers were stolen from other teams (who had no choice other than
x86 hardware), so it's in my interest to argue against buying cheap gear. And
the extra cost doesn't come out of my team's budget when I'm out stealing :)
More information about the rescue