[rescue] ide vs scsi
rnovak at indyramp.com
Sat Apr 12 21:46:41 CDT 2003
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 09:22:17PM -0500, Bill Bradford wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 09:29:13PM -0400, Chris Hedemark wrote:
> > But being on the recovery side of a year and a half of unemployment,
> > I've got SCSI tastes on an IDE budget right now.
> Exactly. *THIS* is why I use IDE - I can throw an 80G disk in the
> machine that serves these lists and web pages for less than $100 nowdays -
> while doing it SCSI would require 2 drives and a PCI SCSI controller.
You *can* get SCSI and IDE capacity (i.e. same number of bytes)
for the same price, with a bit of looking, but the SCSI has a
lower density at lower prices--so it can require more electrical power, desk
space/rack space, enclosure space, cabling, and of course
controllers if you don't already have them.
I've seen 60GB IDE for $65 or so, and I've seen 9GB SCA WSCSI for $10,
both with 90 day warranty. So I could get pretty good performance
from 7 of the 9gb disks, but that's a foot of disk vs. an inch of it.
> I could use more RAM, though... (anybody got U5/10 RAM for cheap?)
Yep. Do you still have the quotes I pasted to ya?
Robert Novak, Indyramp Consulting * rnovak at indyramp.com * indyramp.com/~rnovak
"I don't want to doubt you, Know everything about you
I don't want to sit Across the table from you Wishing I could run."
More information about the rescue