[rescue] Why is everyone so OSX happy?
mcguire at neurotica.com
Fri Apr 11 21:09:16 CDT 2003
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 09:45 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo
>>> Indeed.... many disk performance problems go away when you add more
>>> RAM (up to a point, of course).
>> ...then it wasn't a disk performance problem in the first place!
> Not necessarily, if having more disk caching in RAM allows you to
> re-order the disk writes and thus reduce seek time.
I have other uses for my RAM than acting as a crutch for a
poorly-designed disk subsystem.
Hmm...further, I'd rather just have my drives reorder their writes.
Oh, I forgot...IDE isn't smart enough to do that yet, is it?
Shit, I had an SMD disk subsystem on a VAX nearly fifteen years ago
that could do that.
> Note the caveat - perhaps Apple's IDE drivers suck. Wouldn't put it
> past them since it gives them market differentiation.
Ok, I could buy that. But what about NetBSD...FreeBSD...Linux..on
Alphas and x86 boxes alike...all of which I've seen perform better with
a real disk subsystem? My observations are based on a lot more
observation than dicking around with OS X for the past few
months...otherwise I wouldn't take such a strong stand about it.
> Anyone here got a dmesg from an OSX box with IDE drive(s)?
My TiBook has an IDE drive...I don't see anything in the message
buffer or in syslog about it though...? :-/
Dave McGuire "I've grown hair again, just
St. Petersburg, FL for the occasion." -Doc Shipley
More information about the rescue