[geeks] tis the season for hardware to fail...

[Shannon]

On 12-Apr-2011 09:11, Joshua Boyd wrote:


> However, you also skipped the 2048x1152 resolution available in 23" from
> Samsung, or 27" from Acer.  The nice thing about this resolution is that
> it doesn't require dual link DVI, and thus is more widely compatible.
> It also has 2.5% more pixels than 1920x1200.  The down side is that the
> extra 48 vertical pixels is probably more valuable than the extra 128
> horizontal pixels.  The other downside is that this resolution is
> getting rarer.

I skipped that because my DVI switch is only 1920x1200, officially anyway.

I share KVM between a PC and a Mac.