[geeks] Terminal Services security
    Kevin 
    kevin at mpcf.com
       
    Tue Feb 10 14:58:20 CST 2004
    
    
  
By "payroll processor" i meant an out-sourced company that we
use for payroll, not an individual within my company.  I'd never
let anyone do that, from here, no matter the amount of bitching
and moaning.
Thanks,
/KRM
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:17:23 -0600
"Jonathan C. Patschke" <jp at celestrion.net> wrote:
>
> > Personally, i don't think that having any MS OS directly
> > facing the net is a wise decision, but our payroll processor
> > seems to think that Win2k Terminal Services is some type of
> > impenetrable fortress.
> 
> He's a payroll processor, not a network administrator.  If shit
> hits the fan, he won't be the person they wake up at 2am to fix
> stuff.  Of COURSE he thinks it's a good idea.
    
    
More information about the geeks
mailing list