[geeks] 2 solaris 10 questions
alaric at caerllewys.net
Wed Sep 29 21:25:07 CDT 2004
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:02:15PM -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> Because it has square pixels. It's a good compromise for 19-20 inch
> monitors where 1280x1024 is flat, 1280x960 is not enough, and anything
> higher than 1400x1050 is too much.
That's a matter of opinion. In mine, 19-20" is 1600x1200 territory.
There's no reason on earth not to use all the resolution your graphics
subsystem is capable of rendering stably. Remember, you can *always*
make your terminal fonts larger if they're too small at the top
resolution. The same on-screen-size characters, rendered in more
pixels, are cleaner and more readable.
========== Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. ==========
alaric at caerllewys.net : phil-stracchino at earthlink.net : phil at novylen.net
phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek
2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold)
Linux Now! ...Friends don't let friends use Microsoft.
More information about the geeks